Subject: RE: [xsl] XSLT & SQL From: "Michael Kay" <michael.h.kay@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2002 17:54:07 +0100 |
> However the spec does say, if my memory is correct, that the > document function must be supported and that document can > access a URI, right. Although no specific URI scheme is made > obligatory it is obligatory that one support some URI scheme. A processor would be conformant, but not very saleable, if it provided a document() function that always failed regardless what URI you supply. There's nothing in the spec that says at least one URI scheme must be supported. Michael Kay Software AG home: Michael.H.Kay@xxxxxxxxxxxx work: Michael.Kay@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] XSLT & SQL, David Carlisle | Thread | Re: [xsl] XSLT & SQL, Charles Knell |
Re: [xsl] XSLT & SQL, David Carlisle | Date | Re: [xsl] XSLT & SQL, David Carlisle |
Month |