Subject: RE: [xsl] xslt 2 grouping - solution and result: xsl-fo property list. From: DPawson@xxxxxxxxxxx Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2002 08:33:39 +0100 |
Mike wrote: > distinct-values() is probably fairly stable, modulo some discussion > about whether the order of the result is well-defined. But it > depends on > the definition of deep-equal(), which is still rather incompletely > defined. <grin/>A bit deep for me Mike :-) (I like DC's usage though, not deep at all!) regards DaveP. - NOTICE: The information contained in this email and any attachments is confidential and may be legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient you are hereby notified that you must not use, disclose, distribute, copy, print or rely on this email's content. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and then delete the email and any attachments from your system. RNIB has made strenuous efforts to ensure that emails and any attachments generated by its staff are free from viruses. However, it cannot accept any responsibility for any viruses which are transmitted. We therefore recommend you scan all attachments. Please note that the statements and views expressed in this email and any attachments are those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of RNIB. RNIB Registered Charity Number: 226227 Website: http://www.rnib.org.uk XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] XSL FAQ Page, Christopher R. Maden | Thread | [xsl] template names, DPawson |
[xsl] RE: XSL FAQ Page - encoding i, DPawson | Date | RE: [xsl] conditional template matc, Michael Kay |
Month |