Subject: Re: [xsl] Naming conventions From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2002 11:54:21 +0100 |
> The unfortunate thing is that XPath 1 chose hyphenated-words and XML > Schema chose camelCase. There's not much we can do about it now. You could, as in the XSLT 1.1 draft, have specified a mapping between camel case and hyphen conventions. Then used Xpath conventions in Xpath. (better still would have not to have had the gHorribleNames in XPath at all, spelling them as g-horrible-name wouldn't really make them any more palatable) David _____________________________________________________________________ This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp or alternatively call Star Internet for details on the Virus Scanning Service. XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] Naming conventions, Michael Kay | Thread | Re: [xsl] Naming conventions, Vasu Chakkera |
Re: [xsl] how to use xsl template t, Francis Norton | Date | Re: [xsl] Using JavaScript to acces, Agnes Kielen |
Month |