Subject: RE: [xsl] in XSL other than d-o-e ? From: "Julian Reschke" <julian.reschke@xxxxxx> Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2002 11:10:44 +0200 |
> From: owner-xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > [mailto:owner-xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Jochen > Metzger > Sent: Friday, July 19, 2002 10:55 AM > To: XSL-List@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: [xsl] in XSL other than d-o-e ? > > > Hi folks, > I'm new to xsl and read the thread: > > "Non-well-formed HTML in XSL" > > So know I'm wondering if there's an other way using > in an XSL-Stylesheet without using d-o-e Just declare it in the doctype withing the XSLT. Otherwise, just use " " (which is the same Unicode character). > This is the way I do it right now: > <xsl:text disable-output-escaping="yes">&nbsp;</xsl:text> > > Is there another, much easier way? XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
[xsl] in XSL other than d-o-, Jochen Metzger | Thread | Re: [xsl] in XSL other than , Jeni Tennison |
Re: [xsl] The longest node in a nod, Jeni Tennison | Date | Re: [xsl] JavaScript and XSL Proble, Jeni Tennison |
Month |