RE: [xsl]   in XSL other than d-o-e ?

Subject: RE: [xsl]   in XSL other than d-o-e ?
From: "Julian Reschke" <julian.reschke@xxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2002 11:10:44 +0200
> From: owner-xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:owner-xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Jochen
> Metzger
> Sent: Friday, July 19, 2002 10:55 AM
> To: XSL-List@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [xsl] &nbsp; in XSL other than d-o-e ?
>
>
> Hi folks,
>  I'm new to xsl and read the thread:
>
> "Non-well-formed HTML in XSL"
>
> So know I'm wondering if there's an other way using
> &nbsp; in an XSL-Stylesheet without using d-o-e

Just declare it in the doctype withing the XSLT. Otherwise, just use
"&#160;" (which is the same Unicode character).

> This is the way I do it right now:
> <xsl:text disable-output-escaping="yes">&amp;nbsp;</xsl:text>
>
> Is there another, much easier way?




 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list


Current Thread