Subject: Re: [xsl] Hierarchy problem From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2002 12:52:44 +0100 |
> I'm looking for *immediate* descendent, i ie child, that's the one I didn't have a typo in, using / instead of // > count($x//*|$y) = count($x//*) > implies that node $y is a member of the set which is all the children of $x? > Is that right? No! If you want child (or as you insist on calling it direct descendent) then you want to use the child axis not descendent-or-self, so that would be count($x/*|$y) = count($x/*) ^ ^ also y contains a node set of more than one node, in general so you mean the node set y is a subset of ... not the node y is a member of .... David _____________________________________________________________________ This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp or alternatively call Star Internet for details on the Virus Scanning Service. XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] Hierarchy problem, DPawson | Thread | RE: [xsl] Hierarchy problem, DPawson |
RE: [xsl] The longest node in a nod, DPawson | Date | RE: [xsl] Hierarchy problem, DPawson |
Month |