Subject: RE: [xsl] Newsgroup? From: "James Fuller" <james.fuller@xxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2002 20:56:52 +0100 |
> -----Original Message----- > From: owner-xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > [mailto:owner-xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Jeff Kenton > Sent: 22 August 2002 19:51 > To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: RE: [xsl] Newsgroup? > > > On Thu, 22 Aug 2002, Wendell Piez wrote: > > .. > ..I agree. We have public archives, and they are mirrored in at least one > ..place (I think at least two). More discussion of XSLT in any > venue whatever > ..is a good thing, I think; but if isn't really broke then why > fix this list? > .. > > To me, this is the right answer. As long as the list is archived, and > mirrored, it's far better the way it is than to make a newsgroup of it. nntp is dead for me ....... but I can understand the amount of tools that reuse nntp.....but adding it now will cause fractionation and general headache; and the guys who maintain the list do a great job now, wouldnt want to give em more work; in my opinion if there was an equivilent paypal-like 'paybeer' then a crate would be finding its way to mulberrytech..... cheers, jim fuller XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] Newsgroup?, Jeff Kenton | Thread | [xsl] scripts for XALAN, Roman Huditsch |
[xsl] RENDER_SVG with FOP, tpass001 | Date | RE: [xsl] javax.xml.transform throw, Scott Purcell |
Month |