Subject: RE: [xsl] tag minimisation From: "Andrew Welch" <awelch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2002 11:47:41 +0100 |
> > <br>'s aren't the problem, nor are <a> or <img>, as these generally > > don't have styles. > > You are concentrating on css styling the problem with br etc > is greater > they simply don't work at all if IE sees them in html mode as > <br></br> Well that depends on how the serlialiser works - by preventing tag minimisation I dont necessarily want elements whose content model is EMPTY to be expanded. I wouldn't write a literal result element such as <br /> as <br></br>, so if the serialiser left that as <br /> all would be well. LRE's should remain as they are written. Elements that the serialiser finds to be empty should be left expanded as well. I guess it all comes down to if the serialiser can distinguish between <foo/> and <foo></foo>. > But if the intention is to produce something acceptble to legacy > browsers, it doesn't work. XSLT2 draft gives you an xhtml > output mode as > part of the standard and as Mike has said, some systems > already provide > it as an extension. Yeah, this looks like the answer. Im guessing, but here is the xhtml serialiser aware of the elements that are html, and as such knows not to minimise them - effectively what Im talking about? cheers andrew --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.385 / Virus Database: 217 - Release Date: 04/09/2002 XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] tag minimisation, Américo Albuquerque | Thread | Re: [xsl] tag minimisation, David Carlisle |
[xsl] Unable to access all element , MR | Date | Re: [xsl] tag minimisation, David Carlisle |
Month |