Subject: RE: [xsl] href with & ? From: "Julian Reschke" <julian.reschke@xxxxxx> Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2002 01:41:01 +0200 |
> From: owner-xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > [mailto:owner-xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Peter Davis > Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 11:05 PM > To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: [xsl] href with & ? > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Tuesday 17 September 2002 13:39, Holmberg Rick-ra0119 wrote: > > I was thinking that somehow because it was a part of the href, that it > > needed to be & instead of & to show up correctly. > > You are right that it should be "&" in HTML, but the XSLT page is No, he isn't. It's "&" *both* in HTML and XML. > in XML. It > is only translated to HTML by the XSLT engine's serializer, when > you specify > an <xsl:output method="html"/> tag. The engine doesn't copy the text > literally; it first parses the XSLT page using a normal XML > parser, and then > serializes the parsed text according to the output method and encoding. Correct. But note that it would be a *bug* if the XSLT engine serialized the ampersand just as "&" in HTML attributes. Julian -- <green/>bytes GmbH -- http://www.greenbytes.de -- tel:+492512807760 XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] href with & ?, Peter Davis | Thread | Re: [xsl] href with & ?, Peter Davis |
Re: [xsl] Is it possible to group b, Wendell Piez | Date | [xsl] number in xsl:for-each (newbi, thomas |
Month |