Subject: Re: [xsl] hardware xml / xslt From: Joerg Heinicke <joerg.heinicke@xxxxxx> Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2002 14:32:24 +0200 |
I don't know, I recently saw some benchmarks for xalan(c++ version) running against large(10+ mb) xml files and it performed worst out of the processors involved, msxml performed best(can't remember where I read this). I suppose one reason for datapower's product would be that it handles large xml files quickly, in that context and if xalan indeed does perform poorly against large files it does not seem to be a good comparison.
Hey, you wouldn't expect them to compare themselves against the *best* of the competition, would you? This is a US software company, after all, not a team of gentleman cricket players.
Who is the fastest, Mike? Caucho's Resin? libxml/xsl? It is not Saxon. Who do you think they should use?
*Everybody* seems to use Xalan as the baseline because it is blessed by Apache and SUN.
I think you are a brilliant man, Mike, but this was a dickless statement. I don't need to hear US-bashing on this list too.
-Rob
System Development VIRBUS AG Fon +49(0)341-979-7419 Fax +49(0)341-979-7409 joerg.heinicke@xxxxxxxxx www.virbus.de
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] When to hand XSLT off to , Jeff Kenton | Thread | RE: [xsl] hardware xml / xslt, James Fuller |
RE: [xsl] hardware xml / xslt, bryan | Date | RE: [xsl] hardware xml / xslt, James Fuller |
Month |