Subject: Re: [xsl] fallback, saxon and MSXSL From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2002 12:18:05 +0100 |
> Do I have to use function-available instead? yes xsl:fallback inside an element is for the case when the processor does not know how to process that element (because it's an extension or from a later version of xslt) in your case the element is xsl:for-each so saxon will ignore the fallback as it understands for-each. The fact that it can't execute the xpath expression in the select expression is a different issue and generates an xpath error not something that is ever avoided by xsl:fallback. David _____________________________________________________________________ This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp or alternatively call Star Internet for details on the Virus Scanning Service. XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
[xsl] fallback, saxon and MSXSL, DPawson | Thread | RE: [xsl] fallback, saxon and MSXSL, Michael Kay |
RE: [xsl] fallback, saxon and MSXSL, DPawson | Date | Re: [xsl] Boolean Fun, David Carlisle |
Month |