RE: [xsl] fxt xslt comparison

["bryan" <bry@xxxxxxxxxx>]

>My question is:  why would anyone switch? I don't even see anything
that's 
>compelling enough to add to XSLT.  Does anybody who's looked at it in
more 
>detail come to a different conclusion?

I think you'd probably only switch if you used SML. 

The thing I found interesting is that there are a number of similar
languages out there, most of them I don't think give you anything that
xslt doesn't, obviously people use the other languages for some reason
in preference to xslt, what reasons can these be? 

I was just basically looking for an entertaining thread to be spawned
along the lines of what transformation languages it would be cool to
emulate bits of.




 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list