RE: [xsl] fxt xslt comparison

Subject: RE: [xsl] fxt xslt comparison
From: "bryan" <bry@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2002 14:29:51 +0200
>My question is:  why would anyone switch? I don't even see anything
>compelling enough to add to XSLT.  Does anybody who's looked at it in
>detail come to a different conclusion?

I think you'd probably only switch if you used SML. 

The thing I found interesting is that there are a number of similar
languages out there, most of them I don't think give you anything that
xslt doesn't, obviously people use the other languages for some reason
in preference to xslt, what reasons can these be? 

I was just basically looking for an entertaining thread to be spawned
along the lines of what transformation languages it would be cool to
emulate bits of.

 XSL-List info and archive:

Current Thread