Subject: [xsl] Arguments for XSL From: "Mark Micallef" <mmica@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2002 15:15:30 +0200 |
Hi All, I've spent considerable time setting up an architecture using XML and XSL in order to produce a help-system for one of our software products. I feel using this system is much better than using a WYSIWYG editor because it allows the writer to concentrate on content and not on formatting. Formatting can be done by a different person or at a different time via XSL style-sheets. I've pitched this idea to my manager and he likes it but when we sent the whole package of to our head-office abroad for translation into different languages, they didn't like it. They prefer using a WYSIWYG editor (specifically ROBOHELP). My gut feel is XML is better even tho a WYSIWYG editor allows you to see results immediately without compiling or anything. Does anyone have any thoughts about this? Am I right or wrong? If so, why? Thanks for your help, Mark XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
[xsl] XML+XSL --> HTML, Satish, L. Gnanendra | Thread | Re: [xsl] Arguments for XSL, Jeni Tennison |
RE: [xsl] Muenchian Method Doesn't , DPawson | Date | Re: [xsl] Arguments for XSL, Jeni Tennison |
Month |