Subject: Functional Language wasRE: [xsl] Re: declarative language, need for loops etc. From: "bryan" <bry@xxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2002 10:35:08 +0200 |
>While XSLT is considered to be a functional language by experts in this >field, it is definitely not a very nice representative of this class of >programming languages. OOOOH that's a baaad thing you said. :) Anyway, it seems to me that you prefer Haskell out of the various functional languages, do you have a particular reason for this? I have problems with Haskell, I've tried and I've tried but it's frankly quite hard for me to follow programs written in Haskell once they get beyond a couple pages when printed, for functional languages I prefer Lisp and Erlang. Especially Erlang. So anyway what do you like especially about Haskell? XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
[xsl] Re: declarative language, nee, Dimitre Novatchev | Thread | [xsl] How to pass on xml informatio, aSad Khan |
RE: [xsl] I've problems parsing xht, Marcial Atienzar Nav | Date | Re: [xsl] Top n values, Vasu Chakkera |
Month |