Re: [xsl] optional children

Subject: Re: [xsl] optional children
From: Jeni Tennison <jeni@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 14:58:39 +0100
Hi Dan,

>> Oleg's solution is neater anyway though, as long as it's unlikely
>> that there'll be hordes of children of a (because if there were
>> lots of children then doing count()s would involve a lot of node
>> visits which would take time).
> See my earlier message. I'm not sure Oleg's solution actually
> meets the specified problem.

True; it does with a minor change though:

  b and count(b|c|d) = count(*)



Jeni Tennison

 XSL-List info and archive:

Current Thread