Subject: Re: [xsl] optional children From: Jeni Tennison <jeni@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 14:58:39 +0100 |
Hi Dan, >> Oleg's solution is neater anyway though, as long as it's unlikely >> that there'll be hordes of children of a (because if there were >> lots of children then doing count()s would involve a lot of node >> visits which would take time). > > See my earlier message. I'm not sure Oleg's solution actually > meets the specified problem. True; it does with a minor change though: b and count(b|c|d) = count(*) Cheers, Jeni --- Jeni Tennison http://www.jenitennison.com/ XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] optional children, Yates, Danny (ANTS) | Thread | RE: [xsl] optional children, Andrew Welch |
Re: [xsl] optional children, Oleg Tkachenko | Date | RE: [xsl] optional children, Andrew Welch |
Month |