Subject: RE: [xsl] RTF to XHTML and back From: "bryan" <bry@xxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2002 10:16:41 +0200 |
>Another thing is, alot of people seem to be doing XML-FO to RTF or HTML >etc. Maybe I should go to XML-FO as an intermediate format? For example >going RTF to XML-FO then XML-FO to XHTML. That would be XSL-FO, just to get syntax right. Question when you say RTF does it have to be RTF or could it be Word documents? Can it be limited to Word 2000 for example? XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
[xsl] RTF to XHTML and back, Kelly | Thread | [xsl] RTF to XHTML and back, Mitch Amiano |
RE: [xsl] LaTeX -> RTF, is XSLT the, bryan | Date | Re: [xsl] LaTeX -> RTF, is XSLT the, David Carlisle |
Month |