Subject: Re: [xsl] Inheriting an attribute from first ancestor that defines it From: "Sean O'Halpin" <seanohalpin@xxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2002 11:44:51 +0100 |
Wow! Talk about responsive. Thank you both very much James and Michael. Both solutions do exactly what I wanted. Now I just have to figure out why: (ancestor::*/@att) selects elements in document order whereas ancestor::*[@att] selects them in reverse (which is what I'd expect). Regards, Sean XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] Inheriting an attribute f, Michael Kay | Thread | RE: [xsl] Inheriting an attribute f, James Carlyle |
[xsl] Comparing date values, Peter Lavender | Date | Re: [xsl] Inheriting an attribute f, Sean O'Halpin |
Month |