Subject: RE: [xsl] MSXML / NBSP problem and resolution From: "Michael Kay" <michael.h.kay@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2002 09:55:20 -0000 |
> me> No it is _mandated_ to add a meta element by the XSLT spec. > > you> Actually, it's a "should" in the spec. > > so it is. I wonder why. (If any system can do html output at > all I'd have thought it could easily do this) > Everything that comes under serialization is a "should" because serialization itself is optional. My own view (and the way that XSLT 2.0 may go) is that serialization should be an optional conformance module, and that most of the things within it should then be "must"s. XSLT 2.0 already has an option to switch off the generation of the <META> element, on the grounds that users may prefer to do it themselves. Michael Kay Software AG home: Michael.H.Kay@xxxxxxxxxxxx work: Michael.Kay@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] MSXML / NBSP problem and , David Carlisle | Thread | Re: [xsl] MSXML / NBSP problem and , David Carlisle |
Re: Antwort: Re: Antwort: RE: Antwo, David Carlisle | Date | Re: [xsl] MSXML / NBSP problem and , David Carlisle |
Month |