Subject: RE: [xsl] About validating post xsl From: "Michael Kay" <michael.h.kay@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2002 23:23:27 -0000 |
> > - Well, hate to be a bit nitpicky (I know you know this), but > just to be explicit, you need to have a single root element > in order for it to be well-formed. The following is a legal > stylesheet is it not? > > <xsl:stylesheet version="1.0" > xmlns:xsl="http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Transform"> > <xsl:template match="/"> > <Foo/> > <Bar/> > </xsl:template> > </xsl:stylesheet> > > But you would certainly not say the result is well-formed :) > I hate to be nit-picky but the result is a well-formed external general parsed entity. Michael Kay Software AG home: Michael.H.Kay@xxxxxxxxxxxx work: Michael.Kay@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] About validating post xsl, Dion Houston | Thread | Re: [xsl] About validating post xsl, Mike Brown |
RE: [xsl] From 2 original xmls to 1, Michael Kay | Date | RE: [xsl] XSL reading URL propertie, Michael Kay |
Month |