Re: [xsl] types of input...

[Francis Norton <francis@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Boo!

(Back again after rather a long time away from the list...)

Jeni Tennison wrote:

> The plan is to have conformance levels so that processors don't have
> to implement the schema-aware aspects of XSLT/XPath 2.0, which I think
> is the biggest problem area in terms of getting XSLT 2.0 implemented.
Aha! Does this mean that the typeTagger transform transform [1] (for 
generating transforms from XSDs to mark up instance data elements with 
type attributes) may have a useful future after all?

Francis.

[1] http://www.schemavalid.com/utils/typeTagger.zip

--
"Never mind manoeuvre, go straight at 'em." - Admiral Horatio Nelson



XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list