Subject: Re: [xsl] speed optimization From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2003 11:04:45 GMT |
> Just to clarify: when referring to rumors, I did *not* refer to your > statements But they were rumours none the less: based on gut feeling (from reading the xslt spec) how an xslt processor should work. I haven't implemented a processor and I haven't run any time tests on those examples (or many others for that matter:-). Of course when writing a stylesheet it helps to have some feeling for how things ought to work, but intuition is a dangerous thing at times and for debugging and profiling a stylesheet once it's written there's no doubt that a debugger and profiler would be more reliable than gut feeling... David ________________________________________________________________________ This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit: http://www.star.net.uk ________________________________________________________________________ XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] speed optimization, Tobias Reif | Thread | Re: [xsl] speed optimization, michael . h . kay |
Re: [xsl] speed optimization, Tobias Reif | Date | [xsl] xsl:document, file formats, Tobias Reif |
Month |