Subject: Re: [xsl] N : M transformation From: Tobias Reif <tobiasreif@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Sat, 01 Feb 2003 13:28:42 +0100 |
I asked for http://www.w3.org/TR/xslt20/#element-result-document aspart of a spec draft, as opposed to the various extensions.
As far as I know saxon 7's the only experimental xslt2 system that's been "announced" Although mention of a xalan xslt2 system has been mentioned on this this list as well (check the archives)
One should be very careful about using any such systems in production of course, XSLT2 is only a draft,
Sure! That's why I wrote "It's your decision if you prefer reliance on drafts or on extensions".
and in particular the multiple output instructions have changed quite a bit over the XSLT2 drafts so there's no assurance that it will end up looking like it does currently.
Using exslt's document extension or the processor specific mechanism provided by an XSLT1 system is to be prefered at present
except for experimenting with the current draft specs.
-- http://www.pinkjuice.com/
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] N : M transformation, David Carlisle | Thread | Re: [xsl] N : M transformation, Tobias Reif |
[xsl] RenderX XEP Academic Edition , David Tolpin | Date | Re: [xsl] N : M transformation, Tobias Reif |
Month |