Subject: RE: [xsl] is XSLT 2.0 implementable? (was: N : M transformation) From: Sergiu Ignat <sergiu@xxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2003 10:33:01 +0200 |
I am a little guy that needs XML Schema validation for inputs to the XSL processor. In my project I build a component that recives XML from different sourses and generates SQL statements to insert or update data in a relational database. In this situation I need to check XML for conformance with the data model I have designed. In another situation, when clients recive XML from the component after a query, they can be 100% sure that it's well formed, so they don't need any schema validation for further transformations. Any validation implies a performance penalty. As mentioned in previous messages the only way to satisfy all of the users is to let the posibility to switch the schema validation ON and OFF. In my opinion, the schema validation must be a feature that permits usage of "Design by Contract" paradigm in the project. It must not be a feature that makes XSL a strongly typed language. Sergiu XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Variable or Query for Spe, David Carlisle | Thread | Re: [xsl] is XSLT 2.0 implementable, Jeni Tennison |
Re: [xsl] creating a node-set at ru, David N Bertoni/Camb | Date | RE: [xsl] creating a node-set at ru, Michael Kay |
Month |