Subject: RE: [xsl] How to implement an array From: Imrran Wahid <devguy2003@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2003 14:06:47 -0800 (PST) |
--- cknell@xxxxxxxxxx wrote: > Do I understand that you have an element which will > contain child elements, each of which you wish to > use as the heading values for a table? > > If that is right, is it also correct that you will > have one or more instances of the parent element, > but that the child elements are optional? That is to > say that all possible child elements will not > necessarily appear in all instances of the parent > element. > > If these things are true, then we have two problems > to solve: > 1) collect all possible values for column names > 2) construct a table with one column for each column > name > > Is this correct? > -- > Charles Knell > cknell@xxxxxxxxxx - email Charles, that is correct. I can implement it without arrays...but the solution is very large and not very elegant. I was hoping xsl provide a more elegant way. Imrran __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now. http://mailplus.yahoo.com XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] How to implement an array, cknell | Thread | RE: RE: [xsl] How to implement an a, cknell |
RE: [xsl] How to implement an array, cknell | Date | RE: [xsl] Is this a sorting bug in , Roger Glover |
Month |