RE: [xsl] Re: Reference to variable cannot be resolved.

Subject: RE: [xsl] Re: Reference to variable cannot be resolved.
From: "Michael Kay" <michael.h.kay@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2003 08:26:38 -0000

> I think the biggest problem here is that the scope of a 
> variable is no longer obvious in these cases. This will also 
> impose an (hidden) order of evaluation, which is not the most 
> desirable feature for a non-imperative language.

The second sentence is nonsense. Variable references are resolved to
variable declarations at compile time, the run-time behavior doesn't
care in the slightest what the original name of the variable was.

Michael Kay
Software AG
home: Michael.H.Kay@xxxxxxxxxxxx
work: Michael.Kay@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx 


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list

Current Thread
Re: [xsl] Reference to variable cannot be resolved., (continued) David Carlisle - Fri, 14 Feb 2003 17:43:48 GMT Dimitre Novatchev - Fri, 14 Feb 2003 20:25:35 +0100 David Carlisle - Fri, 14 Feb 2003 19:52:53 GMT Dimitre Novatchev - Fri, 14 Feb 2003 21:22:37 +0100 Michael Kay - Sat, 15 Feb 2003 08:26:38 -0000 <= Dimitre Novatchev - Sat, 15 Feb 2003 10:32:07 +0100 Michael Kay - Sat, 15 Feb 2003 11:22:30 -0000 Dimitre Novatchev - Sat, 15 Feb 2003 13:08:46 +0100 Américo Albuquerque - Sat, 15 Feb 2003 14:55:46 -0000

Current Thread

Re: [xsl] Reference to variable cannot be resolved., (continued)

<- Previous	Index	Next ->
[xsl] Re: Re: Reference to variable, Dimitre Novatchev	Thread	[xsl] Re: Re: Reference to variable, Dimitre Novatchev
RE: [xsl] Adding/Coercing a Namespa, Michael Kay	Date	[xsl] Re: Re: Reference to variable, Dimitre Novatchev
	Month

<-prev [Thread] next->	<-prev [Date] next->
Month Index \| List Home