Subject: RE: [xsl] Re: Reference to variable cannot be resolved. From: "Michael Kay" <michael.h.kay@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2003 08:26:38 -0000 |
> I think the biggest problem here is that the scope of a > variable is no longer obvious in these cases. This will also > impose an (hidden) order of evaluation, which is not the most > desirable feature for a non-imperative language. The second sentence is nonsense. Variable references are resolved to variable declarations at compile time, the run-time behavior doesn't care in the slightest what the original name of the variable was. Michael Kay Software AG home: Michael.H.Kay@xxxxxxxxxxxx work: Michael.Kay@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
[xsl] Re: Re: Reference to variable, Dimitre Novatchev | Thread | [xsl] Re: Re: Reference to variable, Dimitre Novatchev |
RE: [xsl] Adding/Coercing a Namespa, Michael Kay | Date | [xsl] Re: Re: Reference to variable, Dimitre Novatchev |
Month |