Subject: RE: [xsl] The Perils of Sudden Type-Safety in XPath 2.0 From: "bryan" <bry@xxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2003 10:22:31 +0100 |
> I understand that it can be useful or >necessary to validate against some schema, but I think the whole >utility of DTD and Schema for everyday business has long been >very much overstated. ... just a soapbox issue of mine. I agree a 100%, indeed if you were to read various posts of mine about XSDL you would no doubt begin to envision as someone with a fairly loose grip on sanity, continually foaming at the mouth and raving that the end times are nigh. Curiously enough this is how my co-workers see me nearly every day. The problem that makes me so pessimistic is that because of the overstating of business use many projects, governmental and corporate, are coming along where XSDL usage is mandated. It is this which will cause the ugly hacks I discussed earlier. XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] The Perils of Sudden Type, Gunther Schadow | Thread | Re: [xsl] The Perils of Sudden Type, Kurt Cagle |
RE: [xsl] Should You Comment XSLT A, David N Bertoni/Camb | Date | Re: [xsl] The Perils of Sudden Type, Kurt Cagle |
Month |