Subject: Re: [xsl] A very basic question. From: Mike Brown <mike@xxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2003 19:19:56 -0700 (MST) |
S Woodside wrote: > Also I found Jclark's explanation to be unelightening. Interesting. The moment of epiphany for me was when I saw his unofficial notation for what he was at the time calling a "universal name" (now "expanded-name"): <cars:part xmlns:cars="http://www.cars.com/xml"/> maps to <{http://www.cars.com/xml}part/> I kind of wish they had gone ahead and allowed the latter syntax. XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] A very basic question., S Woodside | Thread | Re: [xsl] A very basic question., S Woodside |
Re: [xsl] A very basic question., S Woodside | Date | Re: [xsl] The Perils of Sudden Type, Gunther Schadow |
Month |