Re: [xsl] XSL-FO versus PostScript

Subject: Re: [xsl] XSL-FO versus PostScript
From: "W. Eliot Kimber" <eliot@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 03 Mar 2003 13:38:40 -0600
Zack Brown wrote:
On Sun, Mar 02, 2003 at 05:54:22PM -0800, W. Eliot Kimber wrote:

Yes--on the EXSLFO list I've discussed several possible low-cost solutions to this limitation,


Do you mean the FOP-dev list or something else? If something else, can
you give subscription information? Google doesn't seem to know about it.

The EXSLFO project mailing list, managed by SourceForge. See exslfo.sourceforge.net.


Cheers,

Eliot
--
W. Eliot Kimber, eliot@xxxxxxxxxx
Consultant, ISOGEN International

1016 La Posada Dr., Suite 240
Austin, TX  78752 Phone: 512.656.4139


XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list



Current Thread