Subject: RE: [xsl] xsl:Key From: "Michael Kay" <mhk@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2003 19:32:03 -0000 |
> I have done some tests : Saxon is really faster than Xalan. > I know that they are two different tree implementations in > Saxon. The use of tinytree seems to decrease the performance > whereas results are really "good" with tree implementation. I'm very interested if you have an example that shows the (full) tree outperforming the tinytree, because I have had difficulty finding such examples myself. The tinytree usually wins because it is faster to build, and uses less memory: in principle the full tree should be faster if you keep it in memory and use it often enough to pay for the extra build cost. > > Are Key's implementation different? > No, the key implementation in the two cases is identical. Michael Kay Software AG home: Michael.H.Kay@xxxxxxxxxxxx work: Michael.Kay@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
[xsl] xsl:Key, Philippe Dubreuil | Thread | [xsl] Programmers Assertion Error, balajeec |
[xsl] Solution: Efficient grouping , Rapido | Date | Re: [xsl] where does one stick the , Mike Brown |
Month |