Subject: RE: [xsl] A list of useful functions that aren't in the core of xsl. From: "Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2003 06:36:56 -0500 (EST) |
On Fri, 21 Mar 2003, bryan wrote: > > http://fxsl.sourceforge.net/ > http://www.exslt.org/ > > these are complimentary. Fxsl implements functions in xslt, exslt > defines a list of functions and implementation guidelines so that one > can have extention functions not otherwise in the core. Saxon and if I > remember correctly Xalan both implement the exslt core functions. having just looked at the FXSL sourceforge site, i'm intrigued by the fact that there are three different .zip files; for MS, Saxon and Xalan, respectively. i'm just about to take a look at FXSL, but is there some reason that functions written in XSLT would need to be processor dependent? curious. rday XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] A list of useful function, bryan | Thread | RE: [xsl] A list of useful function, bryan |
RE: [xsl] perl and xslt, Peter Gibbons-BU | Date | RE: [xsl] A list of useful function, bryan |
Month |