Re: [xsl] Thank you Daniel & Brian...

[Daniel Bibbens <dbibbens@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Good. I'm glad. It looks nice, too :-)

BTW - I've noticed some strict XHTML gotchas with nested tables and
such. Mozilla doesn't format them the way one would like, but IE
does. It's not Mozilla's fault, though, and IE just accomodates. A
quick read of http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/#guidelines helped me.

-----
> X-Original-To: dbibbens@xxxxxxxxxx
> Date: Sun, 30 Mar 2003 19:33:48 -0500
> From: Gan Uesli Starling <alias@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.2.1) Gecko/20021224
> X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
> Sender: owner-xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Reply-To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> X-MailLoop: 1
> 
> 
> Hooray, I got it. My XML/XSLT had worked fine
> before according to MSIE 6 and Mozilla 1.2.1 but
> the validator at W3C hated it. With your help
> now it likes it.
> 
> Result is at:
> 
> http://starling.us/gus_netbsd
> 
> XSLT is at:
> 
> http://starling.ws/XML/howto.xsl
> 
> Things the validator found but were missed by
> Xalan, MSIE and Mozilla were:
> 
> <a> inside of <ol> but without an <li>
> 
> So no can do...
> 
> <ol>
>    <a id="x"></a>
>    <li><h3>bar</h3></li>
> </ol>
> 
> ...must do instead...
> 
> <ol>
>    <li><h3><a id="x">></a>bar</h3></li>
> </ol>
> 
> ...which I knew was right but had expected for
> the above three to catch any such oops. They
> did not, but the 3WC validator did.
> 
> Thanks again,
> 
> Gan
> 
> -- 
> 
>   Mistera Sturno - Rarest Extinct Bird
> 
>   <(+)__       Gan Uesli Starling
>    ((__/)=-    Kalamazoo, MI, USA
>     `||`
>      ++        http://starling.us
> 
> 
>  XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
> 
> 

 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list