Subject: RE: [xsl] A Question **TO** XSLT Newbies From: Edward.Middleton@xxxxxxxxxxx Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2003 16:06:16 +0900 |
>-----Original Message----- >From: Larry Garfield [mailto:larry@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] >I have to agree on this one. Frankly, I found XSLT itself to be fairly >easy to learn, once I got into it. And thinking declaritively in >general wasn't a problem. It's figuring out how to pull data out >properly that is the problem, vis, XPath. I HATE XPath. :-) I don't >know how universal this is, but XPath is always the part of any XSLT >script that gives me the most hassle, every single time. When you think of XML do you think <Tag1> <Taga> <Tagc/> <Tagb>Some Text</Tagb> <Tage/> </Taga> <Tag2/> <Tag3>Some more Text</Tag3> </Tag1> or some thing like. - (Tagc) - (Taga) - (Tagb) - ("Some Text") (Tag1) - (Tage) - (Tag2) - (Tag3) - ("Some more Text") Edward Middleton XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] A Question **TO** XSLT Ne, Prakash, Mayank | Thread | RE: [xsl] A Question **TO** XSLT Ne, "Braumüller, Hans" |
RE: [xsl] Deciding a parameter name, Sundar Shanmugasunda | Date | Re: [xsl] xslt 2.0 examples - DEAD , "Braumüller, Hans" |
Month |