Subject: RE: [xsl] Re: What is the best way to cast integer to string in X SLT2? From: David.Pawson@xxxxxxxxxxx Date: Mon, 12 May 2003 08:29:11 +0100 |
> From: Dimitre Novatchev > Do any examples exist when such implicit casting would be > dangerous/counter-intuitive? If not, then it would be very > useful to allow > implicit casting to string. I'd like to see that on the xsl:stylesheet element. typing="no" then we could forget the types all together, as some people seem to think is possible [see xml-dev archive], yet this example shows isn't. Then Dimitre's example would work. regards DaveP *** snip here **** - NOTICE: The information contained in this email and any attachments is confidential and may be legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient you are hereby notified that you must not use, disclose, distribute, copy, print or rely on this email's content. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and then delete the email and any attachments from your system. RNIB has made strenuous efforts to ensure that emails and any attachments generated by its staff are free from viruses. However, it cannot accept any responsibility for any viruses which are transmitted. We therefore recommend you scan all attachments. Please note that the statements and views expressed in this email and any attachments are those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of RNIB. RNIB Registered Charity Number: 226227 Website: http://www.rnib.org.uk XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] [Slightly OT] Java access, Marcus Andersson | Thread | [xsl] Getting encoding error on svg, Ragulf Pickaxe |
Re: [xsl] [Slightly OT] Java access, Marcus Andersson | Date | Re: [xsl] Evaluating last 3 or 4 ch, David Carlisle |
Month |