Subject: Re: [xsl] Comparison of XSL and XSLTC From: Kevin Jones <kjones@xxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 15 May 2003 14:23:24 +0100 |
On Thursday 15 May 2003 12:53, Jarkko Moilanen wrote: > On Thu, 15 May 2003, Kevin Jones wrote: > > We have a general XSLT benchmark that we use for comparing processor > > performance (see www.sarvega.com). On XalanJ 2.5D1 it indicates XSLTC is > > roughly x3 the performance of XalanJ. > > In my own tests I have come to results that indicate C version to be > better/ more performace when processing document oriented data. And Java > based better when dealing with data oriented sourcetree. Are you comparing against XalanC (the C code version) here as apposed to XSLTC (the XSLT compiler to Java bytecode). From the last figures we produced we also see some oddities between XalanC and XalanJ. XalanC scores higher slightly higher overall but there are a couple of tests where it does really badly making it worse than XalanJ. Comparing against other processors it does appear to be a problem with XalanC doing badly rather than XalanJ doing particularly well. Regards, Kev. XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Comparison of XSL and XSL, Jarkko Moilanen | Thread | RE: [xsl] Comparison of XSL and XSL, Michael Kay |
Re: [xsl] XSLT In the Build Process, Mitch Amiano | Date | [xsl] counter in nested for-eachs, florian |
Month |