Re: XSL-List as SPAM [was RE: [xsl] Finding immediately preceding node.]

[Betty Harvey <betty@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Tommie:

	I also have Spamassassin running but it didn't flag any of these
messages as spam.  I find Spamassassin to be pretty good but occasionally
I will find a few messages that get thrown away by mistake. I have both
Spamassassin and Procmail running.  Procmail has more problems than 
Spamassassin because it relies on keywords.  

Betty

On Mon, 2 Jun 2003, Mulberry Technologies List Owner wrote:

> At 4:40 PM -0500 6/2/03, Lars Huttar wrote:
> >For some reason I didn't get your earlier message.
> >However I got several notices from our "Spam Assassin" software
> >saying that unspecified spam had arrived from xsl-list.  I wonder if
> >anyone else is getting xsl-list messages labeled as spam, and if so, why?
> >I checked SpamCop to see whether comet.de was blacklisted as a spam relayer,
> >and it was not.
> >Just curious.
> 
> I get notified at least a dozen times a day that some filter has rejected a message from XSL-List. I know that mentioning scrip ting  and some sample data (you can figure out what if you think about it) will increase the number of SPAM-rejections , but they seem to occur sort of randomly as well.
> 
> I just throw away the notices unless notice that I am getting one about every message on the list from someone, and then I send them a note.
> 
> -- Tommie
> 


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list