Subject: Re: [xsl] Re: Duplicates From: Dimitre Novatchev <dnovatchev@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2003 00:21:24 -0700 (PDT) |
--- David wrote: > > There are real cases when this is simply unavoidable, > Ah maybe you (and Lars, in other threads today) are turning into Jeni > and can now read users real questions irrespective of the actual text in > the message:-) To be compared with Jeni is a real compliment for me. Thanks. I really miss Jeni in this list. > > > > > Can anybody help me. I want to filter duplicates without use of keys and > > preceding-sibling > > I didn't read this as being in a case where keys won't work > (preceding-sibling wouldn't work in that case either, but preceding > would) rather a case where they would work but were not wanted (for some > reason) In the case of a node-set consisting of nodes from different trees "preceding" is unusable either. > > > > One solution is to use the "make-distinct" template from FXSL. This solution > > was first posted in xsl-list a year and a half ago: > > lots of good stuff in FXSL... Hope more will be coming. ===== Cheers, Dimitre Novatchev. http://fxsl.sourceforge.net/ -- the home of FXSL __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Calendar - Free online calendar with sync to Outlook(TM). http://calendar.yahoo.com XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] change only the value of , Jorg Heymans | Thread | Re: [xsl] Re: Duplicates, David Carlisle |
RE: [xsl] change only the value of , Jarno . Elovirta | Date | [xsl] need help with xhtml output, Guy McArthur |
Month |