Subject: RE: [xsl] template match : node-set paring through multiple-axis relationships From: Jonathan Sprinkle <jonathan.sprinkle@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2003 09:13:56 -0500 |
> If I understand what you're saying, wouldn't it fit your needs > to have an "otherwise" that applies templates to . in a > different mode? > (as above) > Then you can have all the other kinds of template matching you want > for b nodes, e.g. > > <xsl:template match="b[conditions]" mode="different"> > ... > </xsl:template> Lars, Yes, this would be the ideal case. I had read the XSL2.0 command "xsl:next-match" and thought that this would be a good thing to use, but without 2.0 I can't very well use it. ;) If a template has a mode, then will it be matched by default, or only if the mode is called? I considered this as an option, but I did not experiment with it much, because it did not seem appetizing at the time to generate different mode-names (of course, I'm generating name mangle prefixes now, so it would probably not be hard to morph my Nasty Looking (TM) solution into something like this). But as you mentioned, and I alluded to earlier, the generated code need not be pretty (or fast, for my purposes!) so as long as something works pretty well, I will be happy with it. However, I'm sure that I will be optimizing the generated output sometime in the future. :) Jonathan XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] template match : node-set, David Carlisle | Thread | RE: [xsl] template match : node-set, Jonathan Sprinkle |
RE: [xsl] template match : node-set, Jonathan Sprinkle | Date | RE: [xsl] template match : node-set, Jonathan Sprinkle |
Month |