Subject: [xsl] redundancy in string(number(current())) = 'NaN' ?? From: "Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2003 16:38:17 -0400 (EDT) |
just poring over Kay's book, filling in the gaps, and in the section for xsl:message, there's an example that's selecting: //sales[string(number(current()))='NaN'] just to make sure, i'm assuming the "current()" part is redundant, since number() will use the string-value of the context node if there is no argument. do i understand that correctly? if so, i assume that that was just put in for aesthetics. rday -- Robert P. J. Day Eno River Technologies Unix, Linux and Open Source training Waterloo, Ontario www.enoriver.com XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Processing a <br> in XSL-, G. Ken Holman | Thread | Re: [xsl] redundancy in string(numb, David Carlisle |
RE: [xsl] Current node position, Michael Kay | Date | Re: [xsl] redundancy in string(numb, G. Ken Holman |
Month |