Subject: Re: [xsl] Which one's faster From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2003 10:48:30 +0100 |
You could use a stopwatch... It depends on which system you are using, but in any case it is likely to be negligible as they may even produce the same compiled version of the stylesheet, so have identical runn time performance. Compared to things like using keys instead of // which can make orders of magnitude time differences, using or not using xsl:attribute isn't an issue. David ________________________________________________________________________ This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit: http://www.star.net.uk ________________________________________________________________________ XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
[xsl] Which one's faster, Carlos Barroso | Thread | RE: [xsl] Which one's faster, Michael Kay |
[xsl] msxml xpath problem, bryan | Date | RE: [xsl] Namespaces II, Michael Kay |
Month |