Subject: RE: [xsl] XSLT Architecture: Next Step From: Bill Cohagan <bill.cohagan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2003 18:12:25 -0500 |
Didier Says... <As you know, XML is not a language per se but more a set of rules used to created languages. The main advantage is that these produced languages share a common syntax and therefore some generic tools can be used for an entire family of languages. One of these generic tool is XSLT. > Actually XML is very much a language; i.e., it has a well defined set of terminal symbols and a grammar describing which strings are acceptable as strings of the language. Obviously there are a number of parsers out there that utilize this language definition in order to parse these strings. I know I'm nit picking, but ... Regards, Bill XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] XSLT Architecture: Next S, Claudio Russo | Thread | RE: [xsl] XSLT Architecture: Next S, Didier PH Martin |
RE: [xsl] Using XSLT to add markup , Jim Melton | Date | [xsl] Extreme deadlines: Late-break, B. Tommie Usdin |
Month |