Subject: Re: [xsl] Re: Re: XSLT Architecture: Next Step From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 4 Jul 2003 12:42:28 +0100 |
> So, this library, somehow replaces any/some/all of the extensions > provided by MSXML, XALAN, SAXON, and other interpreters? Not really. FXSL is a library of routines _written in_ XSLT (1.0 + node-set extension) so it may or may not offer some functioanlity that overlaps with some extension functions but there is a big difference between writing a program _in_ a language and extending the language itself, even if the two things do the same job in a few cases. > Meaning that is pure XSLT 2.0, the interpreters that stack to XSLT 1.0 > wouldn't be capable of run them? Dimitre has recently provided a second version of the library which uses XSLT2, clearly a program written in XSLT2 won't normally run in an XSLT1 system. Of course XSLT2 is only a draft at present. David ________________________________________________________________________ This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit: http://www.star.net.uk ________________________________________________________________________ XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] Re: Re: XSLT Architecture, Claudio Russo | Thread | [xsl] Re: Re: Re: XSLT Architecture, Dimitre Novatchev |
Re: [xsl] xpath question, Jeni Tennison | Date | [xsl] Precedence of template rules , Marcus Andersson |
Month |