Subject: Re: [xsl] Precedence of template rules on xsl:import From: "Marcus Andersson" <marcan@xxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 4 Jul 2003 15:33:35 +0200 |
Well, I was looking for an alternative to what I was doing and David and Jeni provided me with it (thnx a lot by the way). Another alternative that I found out myself the same second I pushed the send button was to use named templates.But the include does it for now... /Marcus ----- Original Message ----- From: "Michael Kay" <mhk@xxxxxxxxx> To: <xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Friday, July 04, 2003 2:59 PM Subject: RE: [xsl] Precedence of template rules on xsl:import > > But there is a but > > here, namely that the main stylesheet will be generated from > > a config file so I want that the order of the imports > > shouldn't matter. > > But the XSLT specification says that the order of imports does matter, > and if you are generating XSLT then I'm afraid you have to live with the > spec as written. > > Michael Kay > > > XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list > > XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] Precedence of template ru, Michael Kay | Thread | [xsl] node() problem, Greene, Stephen |
RE: [xsl] Re: Re: XSLT Architecture, Claudio Russo | Date | Re: [xsl] Re: Re: XSLT Architecture, Colin Paul Adams |
Month |