Subject: Re: [xsl] Re: Issues with output of IMG, LINK (css) tags and literal ? Parsers faulty or ?? From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2003 10:12:21 +0100 |
> Shouldn't IE be capable of rendering an XHTML document ?? It depends what you mean by "should". If you mean should microsoft support current web standards, then the answer is probably yes. If you mean is IE specified as supporting xhtml and so should it work in my copy, the answer is no. IE doesn't know anything at all about xhtml, your choices are to send it wiuth an html mime type and then it usually sort of works, as it just ignore syntax errrors coming from xml syntax, or, more reliably send it as an xml file with an <?xml-stylesheet PI specifying an "identity" transform, that converts it to html, this only needs one template <xsl:template match="/"> <xsl:copy-of select="."/> </xsl:template> David ________________________________________________________________________ This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit: http://www.star.net.uk ________________________________________________________________________ XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] Re: Issues with output of, SANWAL, ABHISHEK (HP | Thread | [xsl] XMLFilter in a URIResolver, Andrew Welch |
Re: [xsl] Could anyone tell the sig, David Carlisle | Date | [xsl] XMLFilter in a URIResolver, Andrew Welch |
Month |