Subject: RE: [xsl] Re: Re: Re: XSLT 2.0: On xsl:sequence and xsl:copy-of From: "Michael Kay" <mhk@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2003 13:38:20 +0100 |
> Probably someone with proven success with the WG could post this. > > I am definitely not the right person -- sometimes ago I wrote > a comment that > distinct-nodes() is of little use because the order in which > the distinct nodes are returned is implementation dependent. > > The result of this all was that "In the end the WGs decided > to remove the function" ... In my book, anyone who posts a comment saying that a function is of little use, with the result that the function is removed from the library, has been highly successful! (What happened on this in fact was that you triggered a debate about use cases for the function, no one could come up with a requirement that wasn't met by writing $seq/. , and so the function got removed.) Michael Kay XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
[xsl] Re: Re: Re: XSLT 2.0: On xsl:, Dimitre Novatchev | Thread | [xsl] Replace Apostrophe Template -, Kathy Burke |
Re: [xsl] making html-form with an , Mukul Gandhi | Date | RE: [xsl] Re: On XSLT 2.0 Writing S, Michael Kay |
Month |