Subject: Re: [xsl] Notes on Comparison of XSL FO Renderers From: Kobayashi <koba@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2003 09:45:50 +0900 |
Hello Mr. Graham, Thank you for your suggestion. I will revise the presentation method in the next version. Best Regards, Tokushige Kobayashi > Reply to the original mail from: > xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > A single percentage for implementation level is too broad a categorisation to be useful. The XSL 1.0 Recommendation defines three conformance levels, and it would be more useful to present the implementation levels broken up by conformance level. Showing that multiple implementations have 100% or close to 100% for 'Basic' conformance would be a good thing for boosting public confidence in XSL interoperability. Hiding the common level of 'Basic' conformance shows XSL interoperability as worse than it really is and will discourage any people who won't adopt XSL unless there's interoperability. Regards, Tony Graham ------------------------------------------------------------------------ XML Technology Center - Dublin Sun Microsystems Ireland Ltd Phone: +353 1 8199708 Hamilton House, East Point Business Park, Dublin 3 x(70)19708 XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list Tokushige Kobayashi Antenna House, Inc. E-mail koba@xxxxxxxxxxxxx WWW http://www.antenna.co.jp/XML/xml-top.htm WWW http://www.antennahouse.com/xslformatter.html (English) TEL +81-3-3234-1361(direct call) FAX +81-3-3221-9975 Antenna House XSL School http://www.antenna.co.jp/XML/school/xslday.htm XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Notes on Comparison of XS, Tony Graham | Thread | Re: [xsl] Notes on Comparison of XS, Tokushige Kobayashi |
Re: [xsl] Notes on Comparison of XS, Tony Graham | Date | Re: [xsl] XSLT Process for Linux --, Larry Kollar |
Month |