Subject: RE: [xsl] Saxon and FileURLConnection From: "Michael Kay" <mhk@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2003 15:01:42 -0000 |
> My impression is the damage of veering away from the > specificitaion is serious in the case of XSLT and handling of > xsl:import, xsl:include, and document(). A stylesheet that > handles data.xml in each level of a deep hierarchy on a local > disk, but only processes the top-level data.xml when run on a > Unix server or remotely via http is a potential danger. > > Does SAXON 7 exhibit the same behavior? > Saxon 7.8 uses the java.net.URI class, which is generally closer to the RFC than java.net.URL. Michael Kay XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Saxon and FileURLConnecti, David Tolpin | Thread | [xsl] How to Substitute HTML templa, Amir Yiron |
RE: [xsl] Too slow to process XML f, Jack Yang | Date | [xsl] connection to Access, Iris Benjamin |
Month |