Subject: Re: ISO-8859-1 encoding and XmlDecl omision (was Re: [xsl] Looking up keys in a separate xml file) From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2004 16:34:44 GMT |
All of that aside, I wondered why a processor must include a declaration when the output encoding is ascii, as the default input encoding is utf-8 (of which ascii is a subset)? I agree, perhaps you could send a followup to my comment to the comment list, saying you agree with the suggestion! David -- http://www.dcarlisle.demon.co.uk/matthew ________________________________________________________________________ This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit: http://www.star.net.uk ________________________________________________________________________ XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: ISO-8859-1 encoding and XmlDecl, Andrew Welch | Thread | RE: ISO-8859-1 encoding and XmlDecl, Sergio Rodriguez |
RE: ISO-8859-1 encoding and XmlDecl, Andrew Welch | Date | Re: [xsl] Looking for shorthand for, karthikeyan.balasubr |
Month |