Subject: RE: [xsl] libxslt version changes RTF or exsl node-set sorting behavior From: "Michael Kay" <mhk@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2004 17:50:22 -0000 |
> My experience is that node-set() is a badly broken > extension to XSLT-1.0 I think that describing an extension as broken because you have difficulty implementing it using your chosen implementation technology is a little unreasonable. I was not aware before now that anyone opposed this facility. I'm surprised that if you object to it so strongly, you haven't made your views known until now. Given that there are many successful implementations, I don't think the working group would be greatly swayed by an argument based on implementability; but there have been other features (like xx:evaluate()) excluded on similar grounds and you should at least try to make your views known at the right time in the right place. Michael Kay XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] libxslt version changes R, Daniel Veillard | Thread | Re: [xsl] libxslt version changes R, Daniel Veillard |
Re: [xsl] libxslt version changes R, Daniel Veillard | Date | Re: [xsl] libxslt version changes R, Daniel Veillard |
Month |