RE: [xsl] Debugging XSLT

> And by no means, in my opinion, should this debugging 
> facility be a part of the language.

The debugging facility is not part of the language. What the language
does is to enable a stylesheet to make assertions about its input and
output. It's normal good software engineering that programs should
declare their expectations about their input and output. Without such
assertions, there is no bug if the expectations are not satisfied, and
therefore no debugging is possible.

Michael Kay


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list

Current Thread
Re: [xsl] XSLT vs Perl, (continued) David Tolpin - Tue, 3 Feb 2004 23:29:22 +0400 (AMT) Michael Kay - Tue, 3 Feb 2004 20:07:34 -0000 David Tolpin - Wed, 4 Feb 2004 01:07:01 +0400 (AMT) Adam Turoff - Tue, 3 Feb 2004 16:48:05 -0500 Michael Kay - Tue, 3 Feb 2004 22:53:00 -0000 <= David Tolpin - Wed, 4 Feb 2004 10:10:03 +0400 (AMT) Michael Kay - Wed, 4 Feb 2004 12:04:27 -0000 David Carlisle - Wed, 4 Feb 2004 13:07:41 GMT David Tolpin - Thu, 5 Feb 2004 00:18:45 +0400 (AMT)

Current Thread

Re: [xsl] XSLT vs Perl, (continued)

<- Previous	Index	Next ->
Re: [xsl] Debugging XSLT, Adam Turoff	Thread	RE: [xsl] Debugging XSLT, David Tolpin
Re: [xsl] XSLT vs Perl, Michael Fuller	Date	RE: [xsl] XSLT vs Perl, Michael Kay
	Month

<-prev [Thread] next->	<-prev [Date] next->
Month Index \| List Home