Subject: RE: [xsl] Re: Re: alternative for modes From: "Peter Billen" <peter@xxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2004 17:04:10 +0100 |
No, I'm sorry, my english is not that fluid :) Yup, I quickly read through the docs, it's indeed not that easy. As said, I probably might try it out. Peter -----Original Message----- From: owner-xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Dimitre Novatchev Sent: donderdag 12 februari 2004 16:59 To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [xsl] Re: Re: alternative for modes "jean pujol" <jean.pujol@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:402B9A0C.84A55436@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > I think he meant that his problem was a 'school exercise', an XSLT exercise to > be more accurate Yes, after reading the message again I see that I misunderstood its contents. Sorry for this, Peter. But let me then assure you that FXSL is not too complex and may be used even as part of a school exercise :o) Cheers, Dimitre Novatchev, FXSL developer, http://fxsl.sourceforge.net/ -- the home of FXSL Resume: http://fxsl.sf.net/DNovatchev/Resume/Res.html XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
[xsl] Re: Re: alternative for modes, Dimitre Novatchev | Thread | RE: [xsl] Re: Re: alternative for m, Peter Billen |
[xsl] Re: Re: alternative for modes, Dimitre Novatchev | Date | RE: [xsl] Re: Re: alternative for m, Peter Billen |
Month |