Subject: RE: [xsl] Normalize / Simplify HTML-Tables with row-span / col-span From: David Tolpin <dvd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2004 13:42:40 +0400 (AMT) |
> I think most of us have control of our target environments, so > portability comes last compared to functionality, performance and > maintainability. Having to convert RTF's to a node-set is a pain, the > difference between the two is only theoretical, and the sooner they're > forgotten about the better :) Except that RTF can be generated much more efficiently than node-set; and some implementations fell into a trap somewhere around this issue while implementing extension node-set call -- making it too inefficient. Not having to explicitely convert RTF to a node-set can lead to either inefficient code or to complex non-local optimizations in the processor. David Tolpin http://davidashen.net/ XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Normalize / Simplify HTML, David Carlisle | Thread | RE: [xsl] Normalize / Simplify HTML, Andrew Welch |
Re: XSLT 2 backwards compatibility , David Tolpin | Date | Re: [xsl] Re: is there any tool tha, David Carlisle |
Month |